• Celebrating Holi Festival at home in Butwal.

    Celebrating festivals is a part of preserving culture. It makes us strong and helps to transfer the culture and tradition to the generation. I celebrated the festivel with my kids and wife at home in Butwal, Nepal.

  • Working at school with colleagues

    We conduct differnt programs and activities at school. I involved with other colleagues to such extra curricular activities at my work place.

  • Visiting new places for research and entertainment

    Visiting different places makes refreshed. I like to visit different places to get entertainment in my ledgure time. It helps to develop internal tourise.

  • Taking part at General Election 2017.

    It is my responsibility to fulfil the task assigned by Nepal government and related authority. I involved in the election of the parliament of Nepal.

"SURELY YOU'RE JOKING, MR. FEYNMAN", Flax Golden Tales,

 SURELY YOU'RE JOKING, MR. FEYNMAN

-Feynman & Leighton

Background of the author:

Richard Feynman was born in 1918 and passed away in 1988. He was a renowned American physicist celebrated for his groundbreaking contributions to quantum mechanics, particularly the path integral formulation and quantum electrodynamics, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965. His innovative use of Feynman diagrams provided intuitive visual representations for complex subatomic interactions. Beyond his theoretical work, Feynman was instrumental in the development of the atomic bomb and played a key role in investigating the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. He was one of the greatest theoretical physicists of the 20th century.

Main Points of the Essay:

ü  When Mr. Feynman committed a social error during a tea party organized by the Dean of his college, then after he learned to behave correctly in a social gathering.

ü  In the beginning, he used to sit only with groups of  physics but when he started sitting with a group of other disciplines like zoology, and  biology, then, he became the top student in the college.

ü  This essay tries to say that lot of fun, different kinds of interests in different disciplines and interdisciplinary approaches are the key to successful learning. This essay recounts Feynman's life through his childhood education. He appears as confident, interesting and inspiring. He discovers that he is a great artist, musician,  scientist and critic, too. 

ü  The essay talks about the importance of a sociocultural environment that directly influences learning.

ü  People who are talented and genuine can adjust to any corner of the world by exploring and using their knowledge.

ü  The essay suggests that if we work hard and understand the value of time, we will achieve the destination of our life.

 

Summary:

"Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman" is Richard Feynman's autobiography. It is based on the writer's experience with his college education regarding knowledge and methods. The title of the essay itself captures the point Feynman is trying to make about life and education. The writer claims that knowledge must be based on scientific methods and that it must be gained through an interdisciplinary approach. This essay tries to show that the traditional method of learning is baseless and misleading. Furthermore, a talented and genuine man can adjust anywhere in the world. Interest is the most important motivation in education what and how one learns can be measured.

Richard P. Feynman was a Physics student who completed his undergraduate from MIT, America. He loved his institution too much so that he wanted to graduate from there. However, Prof. Slater did not accept his enrolment because Feynman had to find out what and how the rest of the world was going and doing. So, according to the suggestion of Prof Slater, he decided to go to Princeton College for graduation.

He went to Princeton College with his father by car. He also got a room there. He stayed in the hostel with his friends. The college looked like an imitation of Oxford and Cambridge University. One day, the Dean of Princeton College, Prof. Eisenhart, organised a Tea Party to welcome the new students. Feynman was not very familiar with the culture and manners of such social gatherings. He got confused about how to behave and where to sit. Mr. Feynman was asked if he liked cream or lemon tea. But he replied that he would like both. Listening to his reply, all the people started laughing. At the same time, Mrs Eisenhart commented, “Surely, you are joking, Mr. Feynman!” 

Gradually, Feynman learned the manners of social gatherings at Princeton College. Then, he started going to the tea party and dinner parties as well. In the very beginning, he used to sit in the physics students’ group, but later he started sitting with groups of biologists, zoologists, and philosophers. Mr. Feynman became a talented and genuine student among the college students. He understood the importance of an interdisciplinary approach in learning. So, he realized why Princeton College was right for him.

He started to take part in philosophical discussions and sometimes in biological groups as well as physics classes. He spent lots of time in biological work. He also did research on a phase and discovered the double mutation process. His discovery made him popular among biology students. Later he was invited to Harvard University to give a lecture for biology. Despite his hard work and discovery of new thing in biology, he could not be satisfied. Though he knew and did a lot about biology and other subjects, his actual interest was in physics. So, he expected he would go back to physics sooner.

Mr. Feynman got many opportunities to gain knowledge in different disciplines during his graduation from Princeton College. He got a golden opportunity to observe a cyclotron (An accelerator that imparts energies of several million electron volts to rapidly moving particles) and how it works. He was also invited to conduct a seminar on Biology by Prof. Watson at Harvard University.  So, he gave a lecture to the Biology students at Harvard University. Although Mr Feynman was a physics student, he learned a lot of things and gained experience in Biology. He loves physics more, but equally, he prefers to gain knowledge from different disciplines.

 

The Etiquette of Freedom by Gary Snyder, BBS II, Visions

 Summary and analysis of the essay, "The Etiquette of Freedom" by Gary Snyder.
To find the summary, click here:

THE ETIQUETTE OF FREEDOM

"Girl" BBS II, Vision: Summarya and analysis.

 "Girl" by Jamaica Kincaid (1949) BBS II Year, Business Communication:  Summary and Analysis:




Girl

                    -Jamaica Kincaid (1949)

"Girl" is a monologue of a mother to her daughter by Jamaica Kincaid. In the story, we see the author talking about the things that a young girl should do and learn so that she can be accepted by society. She starts by saying in the beginning that washing clothes is only a task for women, starting on Monday: “Wash the white clothes on Monday”. Then goes on to talk about doing more responsibilities on Tuesday that should only be done by a woman. 

The story is about a mother talking and teaching her young daughter. In this story, Kincaid is trying to show how differently young boys are treated by the same-aged girls and how they are looked at differently for doing the same activities.

The girl’s mother gives her too many commands, ranging from “Wash the white clothes on Monday,” to “Don’t eat fruits on the street.” She should spend time with her mother and respond to her needs.

The mother doesn’t encourage her daughter to share her ideas and feelings. Additionally, the mother doesn’t set her daughter up for success in school and for her future career. She teaches her how to be the perfect woman in society, ranging from “This is how you iron your father’s khaki shirt,” to “This is how you set a table for dinner.

To conclude, this story tries to express the difficulty of mother-daughter relationships, the contradictions of femininity, life under patriarchy, adolescent sexuality, and the legacy of colonialism. In this text, the mother tries to pass down certain beliefs from her culture to her daughter by demanding. For example, she says, “On Sundays, try to walk like a lady,” “This is how you sweep a whole house,” “This is how to behave in the presence of men who don’t know you very well”.

Mother completes her instruction to the girl by showing her “how to make ends meet,” and also by advising her to “always squeeze bread to make sure it’s fresh.” This latter advice prompts the girl to ask what she should do if the baker “won’t let feel the bread.” Mother, disappointed, asks if, “after all,” the girl will become “the kind of woman who the baker won’t let near the bread.” 

"Farewell" by F. G. Lorca: BBS II, Vision

Summary and analysis of the poem "Farewell" by Federico Garcia Lorca (1898- 1936) summary and analysis.


Farewell

F. G. Lorca

Summary and Analysis:

Federico Garcia Lorca's poem "Farewell," translated from the Spanish by Federico Garcia Lorca is a romantic lyric which expresses a desire for the senses to feast on even after death.

The poet or the person (the speaker of the poem) asked someone, perhaps one of his family members, to leave the balcony open if he dies, because from his balcony he wants to see the little boy eating oranges and hear the reaper harvesting the wheat.

There are some people who say that this life on Earth and the physical world here is a world of illusion, meaningless, and our senses are not real; only life after death is real. They give preference to the spirit or the soul. And want to forget the physical world. There are others who give preference to the physical world and condemn the existence of the spiritual world. Unlike them, the poem seems to suggest that this world and the life here is real and we must enjoy it. Our senses are real what we do, hear, or feel have importance. Life is not illusion. We have to make meaningful by enjoying different activities here in the Earth. The poet is not fed up with the worldly activities. So much so that he even after death wants to return back and enjoy the little boy eating oranges and the reaper harvesting the wheat. Eating oranges is symbolic of enjoying earthly activities with pleasure, so is harvesting the wheat.

The poet wants to keep the balance attitude towards the physical and the spiritual world. He seems to believe in both. The world 'balcony' hare is this poem stands for a vintage point from where both inside and outside can be seen. Here inside refers to the soul and outside refers to the physical world. This world 'balcony' has been repeated four times in the poem. This repetition has great significance. He seems, thus, to suggest that souls are real, so are bodies. Acting the present, enjoy it and make it meaningful.

The little 'Farewell' suggests ironical situation or irony of life. The poet does not like to leave the Earth and bid farewell but he has to by force. He is not ready to die because he wants to enjoy the sensory activities here but he is compelled to say farewell. This shows the disparity between human wish or desire and the actuality.

 

BBS II, Business Communication, Unit 7, Visual Communication

 BBS II, Business Communication, Unit: 7, "Visual Communication"

The given material is based on the curriculum of Tribhuvan University, BBS II, Business Communication, Unit: 7, Visual Communication. 

Please click here to find the note: 

Unit: 7, Visual Communication 

"Oral Communication", Unit: 6, BBS II, Business Communication.

Unit: 6, "Oral Communication", BBS II, Business Communication.

BBS II, Business Communicaiton, Unit: 5 "Business Plans, Reports, and Proposals".

 Unit 5, Business Plans, Reports, and Proposals.

Click Here to get the note

"The Fly" BBS II, Business Communication, Visions.

 The Fly

-William Blake 

In the poem The Fly, William Blake compares his life and death to that of a fly that he accidentally kills. He encourages people to enjoy each day like the fly because no one knows when God will take our lives. 

We cannot control our life or death, so worrying about the future makes us sad and takes away our joy. Therefore, we should accept our lives, embrace our fate, and live as fully as we can. 

The poem consists of five small stanzas, each with four lines. The rhyme scheme is ABCB, DEFE, and so on. 

Stanza 1 

In the first stanza, the poet, sitting outside in summer, reflects on a little fly that his careless hand killed. He is unhappy about this act. However, he becomes aware of his actions after killing the fly. As a Romantic Poet, he feels connected to nature. For him, summer and the fly hold meaning. Summer stands for hope, prosperity, and joy, while killing the fly represents disaster, mistakes, and a stark contrast to those feelings. 

Stanza 2 

In the second stanza, the poet likens himself to the fly. He asks the fly, now a symbol of death, a rhetorical question about their similarities. In reality, this comparison may seem flawed. However, the poet speaks in terms of their existence. Both are created by God, both live their lives, and both must eventually die, even though the fly has already met its end. 

Stanza 3 

The third stanza continues from the second. The poet believes they are similar because he, too, dances, drinks, and sings like the fly, until one day when someone, meaning God, will "brush his wing," or take away his life just as he did with the fly. Here, the poet highlights two key points about life: first, both the fly and he (or humanity in general) enjoy their lives, dancing, singing, and drinking. Second, both are destined for death, which is unavoidable. The fly was flitting around until, suddenly, the poet killed it. In the same way, he will face his fate one day. 

Stanzas 4 & 5 

The poet notes that it is thought that makes him, or people in general, different from the fly. This thought has both positive and negative aspects: it makes humans wiser than flies, but it also causes fear of death. The poet states that for humans, thought constitutes our life, strength, and breath, including the thought of death. If a person stops thinking, they can be as happy as a fly, regardless of whether they live or die. 

These lines carry significant meaning and reflect the poem's message. The poet believes that our overthinking—essentially an analysis that leads to paralysis—causes us to suffer, fear, and evade death. This mindset obstructs our happiness. If a person stops worrying about death and starts enjoying the present, they can find happiness similar to that of a fly, which does not worry about death. Thus, the poem ends with a universal message: live life without fixating on the future.

"The Allegory of the Cave" BBS II, Business Communication, Visions.

The Allegory of the Cave

-Plato

The Allegory of the Cave, written by Plato, describes a cave where people are chained as prisoners. They can only see whatever appears in front of them as objects and believe these images are real. An allegory is a symbolic narrative that uses inanimate objects, animals, or events to represent abstract ideas and concepts. This form of symbolism is common in poetry and prose, often used to communicate broader themes like politics, religion, or morality.

Summary and Analysis:

Plato's Allegory of the Cave tells the story of people living in darkness, chained so they can only look at shadows and reflections on the cave wall. They are unaware of a world outside their own. Behind them burns a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway. People carrying objects or puppets on poles pass in front of the fire, allowing prisoners to see the shadows cast on the wall. The shadows often conflict with one another, with some resembling familiar objects like animals or humans. Others are blurred and constantly changing, showing things that are unfamiliar to the prisoners.

In his allegory, Socrates explains to Glaucon that our eyes are like prisoners chained since childhood. They cannot see behind them and can only look at what is in front of them, which is the fire and shadows on the wall. This image illustrates how we take our ability to see and interpret things for granted. Without a different perspective, we believe the shadows are reality. Like prisoners watching shadows on a cave wall, we watch rather than live life, controlled by outside forces like money. Things change when one prisoner breaks free from his chains and discovers the outside world: the sun, real people, and real objects.

One prisoner, who had been there the longest, saw a light and called out to his fellow prisoners. They all realized they were no longer bound and rushed toward it as fast as they could. Their first instinct was to check their eyes, fearing something might be wrong after so long in darkness. Once reassured their eyesight was normal, they reacted with anger. They turned on each other, accusing one another of ruining their chance for freedom. This shows how people often react to new information or knowledge. We tend to get angry when challenged by ideas that conflict with our established beliefs.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave can represent several concepts. For instance, it can serve as an analogy for how our minds work regarding knowledge. We only see shadows on a wall rather than what's around us, basing most of our assumptions and perceptions solely on these shadows. This is why many opinions and perspectives seem true from one viewpoint but wrong from another. In other words, each person sees reality differently because they perceive different shadows.

Main message:

The main message of the Allegory of the Cave is that people who are uneducated or unenlightened are like the prisoners, trapped by their limited view and unable to see the bigger truth of the world.

What does the cave represent in the Allegory of the Cave?

In Plato's Allegory of the Cave, the cave symbolizes the world of appearances and the limited perspective of those who are unenlightened. The prisoners can only see shadows on the wall and believe these shadows constitute reality. They cannot see the larger truth of the world outside the cave, which symbolizes the world of forms or ultimate reality. The cave also reflects the human condition, with the prisoners representing individuals trapped by their narrow views. The prisoner who escapes the cave and sees the outside world illustrates the enlightened individual who has gained a deeper understanding of reality through education. Overall, the cave symbolizes the limits of human understanding and the power of education and enlightenment to overcome these limits and reveal deeper truths about the world.

What does the sun represent in the Allegory of the Cave?

In Plato's Allegory of the Cave, the sun represents the ultimate truth and the ultimate source of knowledge. In the story, the released prisoner first mistakes the sun for a source of fire and is blinded by its brightness. However, as he adjusts to the light, he starts to see the larger truth of the world and the objects that cast the shadows seen by the other prisoners. The sun in the allegory serves as a metaphor for enlightenment and the ultimate source of knowledge and understanding. It represents the goal of the prisoner's journey. Only when he can see the sun can he grasp reality more fully. The sun can also symbolize the divine, representing the ultimate source of knowledge and understanding beyond human comprehension.

"Popular Mechanics" BBS II, Business Communication, Visions


"Popular Mechanics"

-by Raymond Carver 

Analysis, Summary, and Themes 

"Popular Mechanics" tells the story of a separating couple who argue, and the situation quickly escalates. At just under 500 words, the story leaves room for speculation and interpretation. It is often read by older students. 

Summary: 

It's snowy outside and getting dark. Inside, a man is in the bedroom, hurriedly packing his suitcase. A woman says she's glad he's leaving. She starts crying. She takes a picture of the baby from the bed and leaves the room. He wants the picture back. He finishes packing, puts on his coat, and turns out the light. He goes to the living room. The woman stands in the kitchen doorway, holding the baby. He wants to take the baby. She refuses. The baby starts crying. He moves toward her. She retreats into the kitchen, standing in a corner by the stove. He grabs hold of the baby. They argue over him. The baby is screaming. They knock down a flowerpot. He crowds her, trying to break her grip on the baby. He grips the baby under an arm and tries to pull the woman's fingers apart. She feels her grip loosening. As the baby slips away, she screams and grabs for the baby's other arm. She holds one wrist and leans back. The man pulls very hard.

The issue gets decided. What happens to the baby? This is the main point of speculation in the story. We can't say for sure what happens. The two likely possibilities are: 

• The baby gets injured either from a fall or the pulling. 

• The baby is killed either from a fall or the pulling. 

The last sentence of the story reads, "In this manner, the issue was decided." To figure out what happened, we need to answer two questions: 

1. What is the "manner"? 

2. What is the "issue"? 

The "manner" refers to how the couple fights over the baby. Specifically, it involves the physical actions they take at the moment the story ends. The woman is determined not to lose this battle: "She would have it, this baby." Her last action is to lean back while holding the baby's wrist. The man is equally determined: "But he would not let go." His last action is to pull back very hard while holding the baby under an arm near the shoulder. The "manner" of the argument suggests the baby either gets injured or is killed. 

The "issue" is about who gets the baby. This part adds to the uncertainty of the baby's fate. It's crucial to understand that they are fighting over who gets the baby that night. This wouldn't settle their disagreement. A custody dispute is a matter for the courts. If the baby was injured or killed, it would resolve the "issue" of who gets the baby right now: neither of them.  

"The Clock Tower"BBS II, Business Communication, Visions.

 The Clock Tower by Bhupi Serchan: Summary and Analysis: 

Click here to find the note:

"Her First Ball", BBS II, Business Communication, Visions

 Her First Ball by Katherine Mansfield: Summary and Analysis:


Her First Ball

-Katherine Mansfield

 

Characters:

a)    Leila: 18-year-old simple girl, only child, grew up in the country.

b)   The Fat man: A partner who dances with Leila. An old and fat man, attending balls for 30 years, single and bitter, spots the 'fresh meat'.

c)    Meg, Laura, Laure (boy), and  Jose:  They are Sheridan siblings (Leila's cousins)

·       Setting: The story is set in an early 20th-century ballroom, possibly in Wellington, New Zealand.

Summary:

A young girl named Leila is about to attend her first ball with her cousins Meg, Laurie, Laura, and Jose Sheridan. Leila comes from the New Zealand countryside, and her wealthier cousins are surprised that she has never been to a ball before. The Sheridans chat casually about their outfits and the dances ahead, while Leila feels almost overwhelmed with excitement.

When they arrive at the drill hall, Laura helps Leila to the ladies’ room. Women are busy preparing, and while Leila is focused on the noise and excitement, the women appear stressed as they compete for mirror space and worry about their appearance. After the dance programs are handed out, Meg takes Leila to the drill hall. Leila is amazed by how beautiful the room is, and Meg tells the other girls to help Leila find dance partners. However, the girls are more interested in a nearby group of men, who eventually come over to fill out their dance cards.

After getting a few partners, Leila meets an old man who fills out her card even though there’s little space on his. He initially thinks he recognizes Leila from another ball, which is impossible since this is her first one.

Leila waits for her first partner to come to her and reflects on her dance lessons at boarding school. Those lessons were often uncomfortable; the girls had to dance with each other, frequently stepping on toes or bumping into one another. However, her experience with her first partner is much better than those lessons; she notices that he "steered so beautifully." As they dance, he comments on the floor, and Leila replies that it’s "beautifully slippery." This surprises him, and he asks if she attended another ball last week. Leila excitedly shares that this is her first ball, but he doesn’t seem interested.

Leila’s second partner also mentions the floor and a previous ball, which she recognizes as a pattern. Despite this, she remains excited about the night until the old man comes to claim his dance. She is taken aback by how old and shabby he looks; he’s missing a button on his glove, and his coat is dusty. He quickly states that it must be Leila’s first dance, which he can guess because he has attended balls for thirty years. As they dance, he seems to grow sad, telling Leila that she will never be able to attend balls for as long as he has. After all, she’s a woman and will soon be too old to dance. He points out the older women sitting on stage and says Leila will soon be one of them, gossiping about awful men trying to kiss their daughters while secretly heartbroken that men no longer want to kiss them.

Leila feels troubled by her conversation with the old man, especially since she hadn’t thought about her age before. Now, she worries that "this first ball is only the beginning of her last ball." She feels angry at the old man, believing he "spoiled everything." They stop dancing, and Leila decides to lean against the wall instead of going back to the floor. The old man tells her not to take him seriously, and Leila scoffs but remains sulky, wishing she could go home. Soon, another partner approaches, and they start dancing. Suddenly, the ball feels beautiful again. Leila’s partner bumps into the old man, but she doesn’t recognize him and just smiles.

"What I Think, What I Am?" BBS II, Business Communication, Visions.

 What I Think, What I Am? by Edward Hoagland Summary and Analysis with question answers: 


“What I Think, What I Am”

-Edward Hoagland

In the essay, the writer Hoagland offers a clear definition of the personal essay. He suggests that there is a blend of logic and reason in this form of writing. He also notes a great interest in the mind within essays. While many people believe that essays are no longer relevant, Hoagland disagrees. He argues that essays can be marketed more easily than short stories. Storytelling has been around since the time of cave paintings, but movies, novels, and biographies have drained some of that storytelling power. The writer believes that once short stories are written in a specific context, they cannot be improved further. In contrast, essays can be revised and updated in each edition.

Hoagland sees the essay as straddling the line between what you think and who you are. This means it reflects the writer's mind, thoughts, and feelings. He strongly supports personal essays, viewing them as expressions of the human voice. According to him, personal essays represent the mind's spontaneous flow onto the page. He argues that these essays do not follow the structured outlines typical of other writings. In this sense, they are more casual than articles. Essays do not wrap up with a summary as articles do.

An essay communicates from one mind to another. An educated person shares ideas in this format. This makes essays less universally appealing than stories, as they often target an educated, possibly middle-class audience. Personal essays also tell a story while maintaining a specific perspective. A good example is Mark Twain's "Corn-pone Opinions," where Twain describes a 15-year-old boy who listened to a neighbor's slave preach from a woodpile.

A personal essay is often not autobiographical, but it can reveal the author's mindset. This genre differs from others because it focuses directly on the mind. The fascination with the mind forms the essence of essays.

1. What are the similarities and differences, as Hoagland maintains, between an essay on one hand and a story, article, or autobiography on the other?

Ans: An Essay (especially a personal essay) is different from an article because the personal essay is more informal. Unlike stories, it is the voice of human beings. An essay does not usually condense to a summary as articles do. An essay is a mind speaking to a mind so to understand, it needs intellect and a logical mind. It is less universal than stories because the essay is addressed to an educated. For him, autobiographies are generally extended essays that talk only about the writer self.

 

2. An "emphasis upon mind speaking to mind is what makes the essay less universal in its appeal than stories". What does Hoagland mean by this statement?

Ans: He means by this statement that essays are written for educated and intellectual readers. So, to understand essays, there needs minds and intellect. In this regard, the essay is less universal in its appeal than stories.

3. What does Hoagland mean by the statement, "the artful I of an essay can bias chameleon as any narrator in fiction"?

Ans: He means that like in fiction, in the personal essay, the first-person narrator's status and existence become like a chameleon. The narrator changes his colors as a chameleon frequently changes according to the situation. Here color means the narrator's existence throughout the essay.

4. What is Hoagland's tone in his essay?

Ans: Hoagland's tone in his essay is suggestive and appealing (to write a personal essay).

5. How does Hoagland "define" essay? Is the definition formal, or extended?

Ans: Hoagland defines the essay as mind speaking to the mind, the fascination of mind is the fascination of the essay and it does not boil down to a summary. In this regard, the definition seems to be formal.

6. "An essay is intended to convey the same point to each of us". Discuss.

Ans: While comparing the essay with stories, the writer says that the essay is intended to convey the same point and ideas to each of us. He means that a personal essayist does not give symbolic and muddle ideas but he tries to tell us clearly what he wants.

7. What is the relationship between what you think and what you are?

Ans: What you think is related to the mind, what you are is related to your existence. It is interrelated because without a mind, your existence is meaningless and without your existence, you cannot think.

8. "Fascination of the mind is the fascination (of the essay)" (6). Explain.

Ans: The fascination of the mind is the fascination of the essay because essays are directly concerned with the mind. The very freedom of the mind possesses is bestowed on this branch of literature that does honor to. A personal essay frequently is not autobiographical at all, but what it does keep in common with autobiography is that by its tone. It conveys the quality of the author's mind. Nothing gets in the way. It means that only the personal essay and the author's mind are directly connected. So that fascination of the mind to write only can be towards fascination of the essays.

 

"From the Fountainhead to the Future" BBS II, Business Communication, Visions

 "From the Fountainhead to the Future" by Alexandra York: Summary and main points.



"From the Fountainhead to the Future"

-by Alexandra York

The essay "From the Fountainhead to the Future" by Alexandra York argues that a classical ideal of beauty should be the foundation for contemporary art. She starts with the quote, "He who has access to the fountain does not go to the water pot." York believes art has become political and lacks aesthetic value. She claims its true purpose—expressing the highest ideals of humanity—has been lost in recent decades.

York looks back to ancient Greece to find an artistic vision that can inspire deep thinking and noble living. She identifies a troubling split in the twentieth century, where art expresses political ideas while rejecting objective beauty. This has led modern art to create division, pitting classes and races against one another while ignoring any standards of grace and beauty.

For York, painting and sculpture should be representational, music should follow the principles of melody and harmony, and literature should meet Matthew Arnold's standard for culture: "the best that has been thought and said in the world." However, York does not support simply imitating Greek ideals. She points to the Renaissance as an example. Renaissance artists did not copy classical works, but used classical principles to create original art. York argues that this is the approach contemporary artists should take.

Nihilistic: Rejecting all religious and moral principles in the belief that life is  

                  meaningless.

Dichotomy: A division or contrast between two things that are represented as opposed or                      entirely different things.

 

Main Points of the essay:

·        York thinks that the visual arts should represent the outer world.

·        She says that melody, tonality, and harmony should be in music; rhythm, meaning, and idea should be in written works.

·        She claims that written art should have positive content. (Greek art had moral and spiritual parts.)

·        The Greek ideal was personal character, physical fitness, and spiritual wholeness.

·        In American society, by the early 1950s, individualism focused only on money, and people became self-centered.

·        Morality changed into permissiveness, individual freedom turns into license, and objective judgment of art changed into subjective.

·        At the end of 20th century, people praised politics and had to attain maximum satisfaction - there is a division between black and white, men and women, mind and body, art and meaning.

·        Today's media lacks faith in spirituality; they rush to find out about serial killers, rapists, and so on.

·        According to the writer, we live in an emotional crisis world.

·        Family bonds and ties are secondary, while money has become the center of happiness.

·        York thinks that it is essential to have emotional fuel to correct us.

·        It means that not only the mind, but the heart and soul should also be nurtured.

·        According to her, beauty possesses redemptive power - but if beauty is created by human hand, it can be more redemptive and more powerful.

·        To be beautiful in art, there should be reason, ideas, and logic that make it meaningful to us.

·        Beauty helps us to get an aesthetic arrest - it can be in both natural and manmade objects.

·        She supports Renaissance Europeans because they did not try to repeat the Greek ideal but tried to give a rebirth of ideas.

·        She advocates that instead of copying Greek art, we need to give freshness and innovativeness to the art.

Advertisement